Documentation
Projected Scoring Rows
Retained scoring-only rows from single-source projections and joined pairs.
Projected scoring rows let a constraint express an intermediate shape without adding planning entities, problem facts, value ranges, or move-selector targets. They are retained inside the scoring layer and update incrementally as source entities change.
Projection and Join Shapes
| Source shape | API | Emits |
|---|---|---|
| One source row | .project(NamedProjection) |
Up to MAX_EMITS rows per source row |
| One retained joined pair | .project(|left, right| row) |
Exactly one row per joined pair |
| Two retained projected rows | .join(equal(...)) or .join(equal_bi(...)) |
Symmetric or directed row pairs |
Single-source projections use a named Projection<A> type. Joined-pair
projection uses the existing cross-join .project(...) verb with a closure.
Both forms create scoring-only rows; neither form changes the domain model.
Single-Source Projection
The examples on this page use the
example model plus
src/windows.rs below (declare it with mod windows;), and compile in the
model’s src/examples.rs.
Use a named projection type when one entity can emit zero, one, or several
bounded scoring rows. ShiftWindows emits one row for the part of a shift
before 17:00 and one for the part after:
use solverforge::prelude::*;
use crate::domain::Shift;
/// One stretch of a shift. Shifts that run past 17:00 split there, so the
/// overtime part is its own row.
pub struct WorkWindow {
pub shift_id: usize,
pub employee_idx: Option<usize>,
pub date: u32,
pub start: u32,
pub end: u32,
}
impl WorkWindow {
pub fn is_overtime(&self) -> bool {
self.start >= 17
}
pub fn overlaps(&self, other: &WorkWindow) -> bool {
self.date == other.date && self.start < other.end && other.start < self.end
}
}
pub struct ShiftWindows;
impl Projection<Shift> for ShiftWindows {
type Out = WorkWindow;
const MAX_EMITS: usize = 2;
fn project<Sink>(&self, shift: &Shift, sink: &mut Sink)
where
Sink: ProjectionSink<Self::Out>,
{
let window = |start, end| WorkWindow {
shift_id: shift.id,
employee_idx: shift.employee_idx,
date: shift.date,
start,
end,
};
if shift.start < 17 {
sink.emit(window(shift.start, shift.end.min(17)));
}
if shift.end > 17 {
sink.emit(window(shift.start.max(17), shift.end));
}
}
}
Score the overtime rows:
use crate::windows::{ShiftWindows, WorkWindow};
Streams::new()
.for_each(Schedule::shifts())
.project(ShiftWindows)
.filter(|window: &WorkWindow| window.is_overtime())
.penalize(|window: &WorkWindow| HardSoftScore::of_soft(i64::from(window.end - window.start)))
.named("Projected overtime")
MAX_EMITS is part of the contract. Set it to the real maximum number of rows
one source row can emit: retained state sizes each source row’s row list by
MAX_EMITS, and a projection that emits more rows for one input panics, naming
the projection and both counts. Avoid returning Vec from projection
closures; the scoring layer expects bounded emission through ProjectionSink.
Joined-Pair Projection
Use cross-join projection when the row only exists after two source collections match.
struct ShiftLoad {
shift_id: usize,
hours: i64,
max_hours: i64,
}
Streams::new()
.for_each(Schedule::shifts())
.join((
Streams::new().for_each(Schedule::employees()),
equal_bi(
|shift: &Shift| shift.employee_idx,
|employee: &Employee| Some(employee.index),
),
))
.project(|shift: &Shift, employee: &Employee| ShiftLoad {
shift_id: shift.id,
hours: shift.hours(),
max_hours: employee.max_hours,
})
.penalize(hard_weight(|row: &ShiftLoad| {
HardSoftScore::of_hard((row.hours - row.max_hours).max(0))
}))
.named("Shift longer than the employee's limit")
Joined-pair projected rows are retained by joined coordinates, so localized updates from either side of the join can update the
cached scoring rows without materializing facts. The fluent
.project(|left, right| row) shape is unchanged: it creates a projected
JoinedSource and continues through the projected stream API. Incremental
notifications across the relational operator trees emit into reused
caller-owned handle buffers. Buffer reuse does not make projected payload
creation or an entire incremental update allocation-free. Do not confuse that
projected terminal with direct pair scoring, which finalizes onto
OperatorTerminal.
If the rule only needs an aggregate over joined pairs, use direct cross-join grouping instead:
Streams::new()
.for_each(Schedule::shifts())
.join((
Streams::new().for_each(Schedule::employees()),
equal_bi(
|shift: &Shift| shift.employee_idx,
|employee: &Employee| Some(employee.index),
),
))
.group_by(
|_shift: &Shift, employee: &Employee| employee.index,
sum(|(shift, employee): (&Shift, &Employee)| employee.max_hours - shift.hours()),
)
Direct cross-join grouped streams can also continue into complement(...) when
the rule needs default rows for target keys with no joined matches. Keep a
joined-pair projection for scoring rows that need their own named retained
shape; use direct grouping and complementing when the aggregate itself is the
row.
Clone-Free Rows and Keys
Projected outputs, projected self-join keys, and grouped collector values do
not need to implement Clone. This matters for
heavy scoring rows whose data should stay owned by the retained scoring state
rather than cloned through hot paths.
Self-Joins
Projected streams can be filtered, self-joined, merged, grouped, and weighted
like normal scoring state. Use equal(...) when both sides use the same key
and each unordered pair should be considered once. None keys are equal, so
filter unassigned rows out:
use crate::windows::{ShiftWindows, WorkWindow};
Streams::new()
.for_each(Schedule::shifts())
.project(ShiftWindows)
.join(equal(|window: &WorkWindow| window.employee_idx))
.filter(|a: &WorkWindow, b: &WorkWindow| {
a.employee_idx.is_some() && a.shift_id != b.shift_id && a.overlaps(b)
})
.penalize(hard_weight(|_: &WorkWindow, _: &WorkWindow| {
HardSoftScore::ONE_HARD
}))
.named("Projected overlap")
Self-join ordering is coordinate-stable. It follows source ownership and emit index instead of sparse storage row IDs, so row reuse does not define pair orientation.
Use equal_bi(left_key, right_key) when the projected rows have the same output
type but the relationship is oriented, such as a window that ends where the
same employee’s next window starts. The retained scorer evaluates directed
left/right pairs where the left key equals the right key and skips only the
same retained row. Reciprocal rows therefore count as two matches when both
directions satisfy the keys.
use crate::windows::{ShiftWindows, WorkWindow};
Streams::new()
.for_each(Schedule::shifts())
.project(ShiftWindows)
.join(equal_bi(
|left: &WorkWindow| (left.employee_idx, left.date, left.end),
|right: &WorkWindow| (right.employee_idx, right.date, right.start),
))
.penalize(|_: &WorkWindow, _: &WorkWindow| HardSoftScore::ONE_SOFT)
.named("Back-to-back windows")
Low-level projected self-join filters receive each projected row’s primary owner
entity index, not the retained storage row ID. The fluent .filter(|a, b| ...)
shape remains unchanged for normal application constraints.
Group Complements
Projected streams can be grouped and then complemented against a generated fact or entity source. Use this when the projected rows represent demand, coverage, or usage and the constraint also needs explicit rows for keys with no projected matches.
use crate::windows::{ShiftWindows, WorkWindow};
Streams::new()
.for_each(Schedule::shifts())
.project(ShiftWindows)
.group_by(
|window: &WorkWindow| window.employee_idx.unwrap_or(usize::MAX),
count(),
)
.complement(Schedule::employees(), |employee: &Employee| employee.index, |_employee: &Employee| 0usize)
.penalize(|_employee_idx: &usize, count: &usize| {
HardSoftScore::of_soft((*count as i64 - 4).abs())
})
.named("Projected workload balance")
Boundaries
Projected rows are not:
- planning entities
- problem facts
- scalar or list value ranges
- construction targets
- move-selector targets
If a value must be assigned by the solver, model it as a planning variable. Use projected rows when the value only exists to explain or score source entities.
See Also
- Constraint Streams - stream operations and terminal scoring methods
- Score Analysis - explaining score contributions